The Bay of Noon, by Shirley Hazzard, 1970, MacMillan & Co; pictured, Penguin paperback, 1982.
Possibly the best living writer born in
Gioconda proves a brilliant, intriguing, but lonely and disaffected woman, all too eager to gain a new friend, and she and Jenny become steadfast companions. Gioconda’s lover, Gianni, the film director who made Del Tempo Felice, is the man Gioconda credits with saving her life, in some vague, non-melodramatic fashion. As the histories of the two females resolve out of the murk of the past, Hazzard etches a picture of provisional emotional states. Jenny was happy to flee buttoned-down post-War
Hazzard’s concerns are generational, inevitably and even willingly dated, and yet her sensibility is similar to a writer like Doris Lessing, with the same efforts at achingly precise charting of divides between men and women, in a context of post-War rootlessness, and turns retrospective flavour into an asset; it is precisely about the nature of recalling the past and watching it turn into present that is the key-note of The Bay of Noon. Sharing a biting precision in bottling secondary figures, Hazzard’s a more convincingly sensual writer and a less forceful conceptual thinker than Lessing. Sentence for sentence, there aren’t many modern writers who can stand up to her, especially in conjuring epigrams that are biting, cynical, and suggestive of deep hurt. Try, for instance:
“Edmund would assure himself that my disappearance was the best thing for everyone – it is what people always say when they have arranged something exclusively to suit themselves.”
Or:
“Thus, gratefully, he renounced uniqueness for a textbook anonymity.”
Hazzard’s prose is usually at its most lethal when describing the provisional psyche of provincialism or military men, like the patronising, xenophobic Colonel who is Jenny’s supposed superior:
“When I joined (the mission) I knew nothing of the professional soldier in modern times. Seething is the word I find for them: so many of these people, particularly the officers, were perpetually seething – with fury, with fear, and with the daily necessity of striking out before they could be felled by inapprehensible foes. Of this seething, their profession was but a logical extension. (In fact, their attitude to their authorized enemies – Soviets, socialists, and agitators of all breeds – was tinged with a wistful worship. ‘Catch them putting up with a mess like this,’ or ‘They wouldn’t tolerate this set-up for a second.’)”
Gianni presents himself to Jenny as a conceited, opinionated man of the world, offending her when he tries to kiss her in the ruins of
“At this ‘you can imagine’, with its first reference to my own idea of Gianni, its first suggestion of culpability, I felt the compunction one feels when one has ultimately converted – corrupted – another to one’s point of view at the expense of some deep conviction of their own. With this phrase Gioconda acknowledged no only my reservations about Gianni, but their validity as well: there was no gratification in getting my own way; only, much graver, more crucial, the pang at her surrender.”
Such is the way of things in a novella where Gioconda assures Jenny that love, being the most conditional thing in the world, can alter with minute gestures, and that her love for her brother will recede, in time, not in status, but like a landmark in the distance; such indeed is how the narrating Jenny regards all these scenes. Both the processes involved in moving on from a situation, a temporary state of things, and how that situation lingers, affects, determines actions in the future, are the tale’s crucial ideas; how nostalgia can weave itself around the most painful moments in life.
The irony that slowly becomes apparent is that Jenny has skipped out from one situation with the threat of real incest and stumbled into another, albeit only metaphorically, as the go-nowhere romance of Jenny and Justin (the aural and visual similarity of the names of all four major protagonists is obvious) segues into a psycho-sexual train wreck where, whilst Jenny is stricken with jaundice, Justin and Gioconda skip off to Seville for a romp whilst a distraught Gianni comes to Jenny for comfort, which he finally gets. It is, as Jenny immediately identifies, more an expression of frustration on Gioconda’s part than a real break, and she, taking an offer to move on with the report to Washington, advises Gianni to go and fetch Gioconda back.
Hazzard excels at reversals of expectation that don’t try too hard to amaze, as when Jenny introduces Justin to Gioconda, with Jenny assuming the meeting to be a crashing disaster, only for Justin to muse on the "remarkable" lady shortly after. It's a moment that’s vital and predicative of what eventuates, and yet only announces itself as a slyly comedic punchline. Likewise Gianni’s resolution from an almost caricatured Italian macho to an intriguing figure pauses to acknowledge that he’s aware of, and likes, his assumed character. Gianni in his fullest realisation is a tender, leonine presence, who can’t entirely countenance being one of those “reformed characters” and give up his wayward, authoritarian masculine ways. In contrast, the humorous but artfully deflecting professional cynic, Tulloch, “seemed fictitious, a sort of sub-plot, something that had no existence other than to augment her experience and mine, to contribute to our legend. He himself had strengthened this impression by the defences – of language, of manner, of making love – he had constructed’ had become their victim, like those heavily fortified towns that invite their own downfall by suggesting that there is something within to assaulted.”
Hazzard’s sensibility is too mediated and textured to favour thematic propaganda or bourgeois exoticism; it’s true, we cling to exotic places, the uncommon experience, and fondly recalled friendship. Her characters have the certain flesh of real people, even if they dance around each-other without really engaging in such a way that would make for a great, rather than a very good, work of literature. Gioconda can act recklessly and Gianni can look like a hero, and then reverse roles. Jenny watches and absorbs with youthful, not entirely wise eyes, so that her wiser older narrator can make that sense of altering perspective, rather than mere incident, the important realisation.
Hazzard’s theory that life tends to revolve around the same constant reference points, in different scales of relationship, is born out in its repeated motifs. The novella’s finale counterpoints two journeys: that of Jenny and Gianni leaving Naples and travelling north, so she can take a ship from Genoa and he can fetch Gioconda from Nice, and then, many years later, Gioconda’s return, when she make the passage from Naples to Capri by hydrofoil. This is a ride that she feels cheats her, in stripping her of the anticipated, rightful, becalmed pace of the old ferry, of the proper chance to gather her thoughts and steel herself before encountering Gioconda again. Likewise, the eerie opening report of a plane that crashes on Vesuvius in a fog that takes days to clear, which, when it does, reveals that the searchers had been looking in the wrong place, anticipates the almost tangential revelation of Justin’s fate in a plane crash that Jenny learns of in the newspaper after many half-hearted stabs at locating him. The volcano itself becomes an emblem, of emotional volatility, naturally, but also in the threat of perpetual stasis, of becoming locked, like the victims of
2 comments:
Over the summer I read The Transit of Venus, The Great Fire, and most recently The Bay of Noon. I found your commentary very insightful. Thank you for the added perspective! So many people find Hazzard's prose near-indecipherable and I appreciate your well-written review.
Hello, Audrey, and I'm very glad this commentary was appealing to you. I hope to read The Transit of Venus soon. I've also got People in Glass Houses on my increasingly high to-be-read stack.
Post a Comment